🔗 Share this article

The reprieve brought by the end of fighting in Gaza is immense. Within Israeli borders, the liberation of captives held alive has led to extensive joy. Throughout Gaza and the West Bank, celebrations have commenced as approximately 2,000 Palestinian prisoners begin their release – though anguish lingers due to ambiguity about the identities of those released and where they will be sent. In northern Gaza, civilians can finally return to dig through rubble for the remains of an believed 10,000 missing people.

Truce Development Contrary to Earlier Odds

As recently as three weeks ago, the probability of a ceasefire seemed unlikely. But it has come into force, and on Monday Donald Trump departed Jerusalem, where he was cheered in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he attended a high-level peace conference of in excess of 20 world leaders, featuring Sir Keir Starmer. The peace initiative initiated there is set to advance at a assembly in the UK. The US president, working alongside international partners, managed to secure this deal come to fruition – contrary to, not due to, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Dreams of Independence Moderated by Previous Experiences

Expectations that the deal signifies the first step toward Palestinian statehood are comprehensible – but, in light of past occurrences, somewhat optimistic. It lacks a transparent trajectory to independence for Palestinians and endangers separating, for the immediate period, Gaza from the West Bank. Additionally the utter devastation this war leaves behind. The omission of any timeframe for Palestinian self-governance in the US initiative undermines vainglorious references, in his Knesset speech, to the “historic dawn” of a “golden age”.

Donald Trump was unable to refrain from dividing and personalising the deal in his speech.

In a period of relief – with the freeing of captives, halt in fighting and resumption of aid – he decided to reinterpret it as a morality play in which he solely reinstated Israel’s prestige after alleged treachery by previous American leaders Obama and Biden. Notwithstanding the Biden administration previously having tried a similar deal: a cessation of hostilities connected with aid delivery and ultimate diplomatic discussions.

Substantive Control Vital for Authentic Resolution

A proposal that refuses one side genuine autonomy cannot yield legitimate peace. The truce and relief shipments are to be applauded. But this is not currently political progress. Without systems securing Palestinian involvement and command over their own establishments, any deal threatens perpetuating oppression under the language of peace.

Relief Imperatives and Recovery Hurdles

Gaza’s people crucially depend on humanitarian aid – and sustenance and pharmaceuticals must be the initial concern. But rebuilding cannot wait. Amid 60 million tonnes of wreckage, Palestinians need help restoring residences, schools, medical centers, mosques and other organizations destroyed by Israel’s incursion. For Gaza’s interim government to prosper, financial support must arrive promptly and protection voids be remedied.

Similar to a large portion of Donald Trump's resolution initiative, references to an multinational security contingent and a proposed “board of peace” are worryingly ambiguous.

Worldwide Endorsement and Prospective Outcomes

Substantial global backing for the Palestinian Authority, permitting it to replace Hamas, is probably the most promising scenario. The immense hardship of the recent period means the moral case for a settlement to the conflict is arguably more pressing than ever. But although the halt in fighting, the repatriation of the hostages and vow by Hamas to “remove weapons from” Gaza should be acknowledged as constructive moves, Mr Trump’s track record provides scant basis to trust he will accomplish – or consider himself obligated to endeavor. Temporary ease should not be interpreted as that the likelihood of a Palestinian state has been brought closer.